Free Essays on The Unbiased Balance

The Unbiased Balance â€Å" Every individual before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion sex, age or mental or physical disability.† -The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Section 15(1)) Canada is defined as a classic example of a liberal-democratic nation. A judiciary system within a liberal democracy is the means by which the law is distributed equally to all citizens. Judiciary independence is important to ensure there is no political interference and that all people receive a fair trial. Some would say that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has made Canada less democratic by placing excessive power in the hands of unelected judges. Although the judicial structure was intended to be apolitical, it evolved into a key aspect of the political process in Canada. Appointed judges, since the creation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, have protected the liberal-democratic ideology by equally representing all peoples of Canada. Judicial independence is the ability of a judge to decide an issue free from pressure or influence. If the judiciary is to exercise a truly impartial and independent adjudicative function, it must not be democratically elected. In order to maintain its independence, the judiciary must be separate from government and other concentrations of power. The primary role of an autonomous judiciary is to advocate the rule of law and to ensure no one is higher than the law. The primary function of the court system is to be the third party, arbiter of the law, that no one person is above. For that reason, democratically elected judges would eventually lead Canada to be undemocratic. If the judges are elected by the people it would lead to partial and ideological decisions. Therefore the decisions of judge would be swayed by public inter... Free Essays on The Unbiased Balance Free Essays on The Unbiased Balance The Unbiased Balance â€Å" Every individual before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion sex, age or mental or physical disability.† -The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Section 15(1)) Canada is defined as a classic example of a liberal-democratic nation. A judiciary system within a liberal democracy is the means by which the law is distributed equally to all citizens. Judiciary independence is important to ensure there is no political interference and that all people receive a fair trial. Some would say that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has made Canada less democratic by placing excessive power in the hands of unelected judges. Although the judicial structure was intended to be apolitical, it evolved into a key aspect of the political process in Canada. Appointed judges, since the creation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, have protected the liberal-democratic ideology by equally representing all peoples of Canada. Judicial independence is the ability of a judge to decide an issue free from pressure or influence. If the judiciary is to exercise a truly impartial and independent adjudicative function, it must not be democratically elected. In order to maintain its independence, the judiciary must be separate from government and other concentrations of power. The primary role of an autonomous judiciary is to advocate the rule of law and to ensure no one is higher than the law. The primary function of the court system is to be the third party, arbiter of the law, that no one person is above. For that reason, democratically elected judges would eventually lead Canada to be undemocratic. If the judges are elected by the people it would lead to partial and ideological decisions. Therefore the decisions of judge would be swayed by public inter...

Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Distance Learning

Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Distance Learning In the world of  online education, often known as distance learning, classes can be asynchronous or synchronous. What do those terms mean?  Knowing the difference between synchronous and asynchronous distance learning can help you choose a program that works best for your schedule, your learning styles and your education. Synchronous Distance Learning Synchronous distance learning occurs when the teacher and pupils interact in different places but during the same time. Students enrolled in synchronous courses are generally required to log on to their computer during a set time at least once a week. Synchronous distance learning may include multimedia components such as group chats, web seminars, video conferencing and phone call-ins. Synchronous learning generally works best for students who can schedule set days and times for their studies. People who like structured courses heavy on student interaction often prefer synchronous learning. Asynchronous Distance Learning Asynchronous distance learning occurs when the teacher and the pupils interact in different places and during different times. Students enrolled in asynchronous courses are able to complete their work whenever they please. Asynchronous distance learning often relies on technology such as email, e-courses, online forums, audio recordings and video recordings. Snail mail is another medium for asynchronous learning. Students with complicated schedules often prefer asynchronous distance learning. It also tends to work well for self-motivated learners who do not need direct guidance to complete their assignments. Choosing the Right Type of Learning When trying to decide between synchronous and asynchronous courses, take your learning style and schedule into consideration. If you get lonely studying independently or feel more comfortable working closely with your professors, synchronous courses may be a better choice. If you are unable to commit to specific class times due to work or family obligations, asynchronous distance learning may be the way to go. Look into more on the pros and cons of the different types of learning.  Ã‚   Teaching in the Multiple  Environments Whether the distance learning environment is synchronous or asynchronous, the teachers goal continues to be putting forth a strong presence, even in an online course. A teacher who relies  on synchronous, asynchronous or a combination of communication approaches must still communicate clearly, frequently and effectively for students to derive the most from the educational experience.